Dear Reader
I ask that you overlook a little vanity and pride on my part. After all, I am human, a work in progress. Today I reached a significant writing milestone. “Can words change the world?” was featured on Foundations and is my 500th published article.
Beyond giving myself a vigorous pat on the back and basking in self-admiration (one might read this as sardonic self-deprecation), I have learned a few things about the tastes of readers in this ten year literary journey. Some of us prefer the abstract. Some of us gravitate towards the tangible.
On the extreme ends of the conceptual/concrete continuum, there are devoted champions to the causes of the idealand the real.
Conceptual————————————————-x————————————————–Concrete
Those who consider themselves as true conceptualist love the abstract to the extreme. To them, there is nothing like a lofty concept to render the proper intellectual kick. On the other hand, those who firmly adhere to concrete statements are pragmatists who would say “Show me. Don’t tell me”. Give them facts, figures and good practices. (As for the rest of us, we tend to fall somewhere in the middle of these two extremes, forming a beautifully symetrical bell shaped curve.)
That sort of intellectual diversity is what makes it very interesting. If not for dissenting opinions and varied styles, our professional literature would be a long, featureless stretch on a road that exists in a simple utilitarian manner. In other words, the journey would be a dull point A to point B proposition.
So, can the written word change the world? Yes, that is possible. But the change is just a potential spark in the form of words. In order to bring the concept into real application, the written word needs its constant complement – the action of key individuals or movements. And wherever you plot yourself on the concept/concrete continuum, it is always wise to remember that not all changes are immediate, positive, monumental, or memorable.